Dogs Don't Wear Pants

katarina5.0

everyone in my row left and it’s because they are cowards.

Brianna

this man: i’m sexually liberated nowhis daughter: i’m traumatized and you’ve neglected me for weeks. i will grow up into a maladjusted adultthis man: :D

Lucinda1.5

Surprised by the positive attention and generous ratings this is getting because it seems very ill-informed about sex work in general and BDSM in particular, and very conflicted in terms of what it thinks its characters are getting out of it. I think the upbeat ending might have something to do with it – it's lovely and charming and full of goodwill, and it almost made me reconsider my stance on the rest of the film. Ultimately though I think Dogs Don't Wear Pants is kind of a mess and doesn't earn the joy it displays in the final few shots. Protagonist Joha finds release and catharsis through exploring BDSM, but the film also weirdly seems to think this has to come at the expense of his career and his relationship with his daughter, although the latter plot thread is frustratingly dropped towards the end of the film. The film's other important character, pro dom Mona, is given very little backstory or detail that would make her arc convincing, and in a movie that seems to think it's progressive that comes across as irritatingly retrograde. She's the same enigmatic sex worker with poor boundaries that I feel like I've seen so many times in the history of cinema – in Dogs Don't Wear Pants she falls for a customer, doesn't seem to mind being stalked, and gives out sexual favours for free – except this time she's wearing latex and enjoys suffocating people. The film has some nice shots I guess but it's also glacially paced and tedious as hell when it isn't being sex-negative and confusing. I feel like it could have benefited significantly from even a small amount of basic research.